I've been listening to some of the Senate hearings involving people like Gonzales and reading some of the transcripts of the trial involving Libby. Wasn't "I can't recall" the most common phrase either of them uttered?
My short-term memory is pretty bad, but I feel like I remember more about what went on with the attorney firings than Gonzales says he remembers and he was there!
I've asked Gonzales to resign. Not that it matters. I'm merely a citizen, and, as we know, the current administration only cares about rich citizens who've given them money.
It's been interesting to hear that even some of the Republican Senators have been somewhat hard on Gonzales. But now Senator Kyle is taking Gonzales off on a tangent about Internet gambling. Geesh. What a great use of the committee's time...
Not-so-Occasional Comments on Life, Death and Many Things in Between by Laurie Mann
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Giving Perpetrators a Media Platform Is Part of the Problem...
Is anyone else annoyed at seeing constant photos of the most recent mass murderer all over the media?
The death video of murderers should not be given so much exposure. It's the sort of thing that should show up on YouTube, so if curious members of the public can learn more about this deranged individual, they can.
I have no interest in learning anything about him. Anyone who commits premeditated murder does not deserve any of the public's time.
We live in a society where a person can alarm his teachers and fellow students, who can be temporarily brought to a mental health facility for treatment, and yet can buy a semi-automatic weapon legally. And we live in a society where the media fuels a feeding frenzy about perpetrators. Perpetrators' names and reason for committing heinous acts should only be briefly discussed publicly. Murderers should never be given the kind of publicity they so obviously sought.
I don't care that the WTC murderers thought that Allah would grant them virgins in the afterlife for slaughtering civilians, don't care that the Columbine and VT Tech murderers were disaffected young men with guns. These people should not matter. Society should not care.
What does matter is that these murderers rob society of good people. The focus should be on the murder victims and how to stop such acts in the future.
The death video of murderers should not be given so much exposure. It's the sort of thing that should show up on YouTube, so if curious members of the public can learn more about this deranged individual, they can.
I have no interest in learning anything about him. Anyone who commits premeditated murder does not deserve any of the public's time.
We live in a society where a person can alarm his teachers and fellow students, who can be temporarily brought to a mental health facility for treatment, and yet can buy a semi-automatic weapon legally. And we live in a society where the media fuels a feeding frenzy about perpetrators. Perpetrators' names and reason for committing heinous acts should only be briefly discussed publicly. Murderers should never be given the kind of publicity they so obviously sought.
I don't care that the WTC murderers thought that Allah would grant them virgins in the afterlife for slaughtering civilians, don't care that the Columbine and VT Tech murderers were disaffected young men with guns. These people should not matter. Society should not care.
What does matter is that these murderers rob society of good people. The focus should be on the murder victims and how to stop such acts in the future.
Monday, April 16, 2007
Guys with Guns Strike Again...
Yeah, I know, guns don't kill people, people kill people.
Tell that to the 20(+?) dead at Virginia Tech and the other 20(+?) injured.
How many do you think this idiot (or these idiots) would have killed without some sort of high-powered rifle??
Tell that to the 20(+?) dead at Virginia Tech and the other 20(+?) injured.
How many do you think this idiot (or these idiots) would have killed without some sort of high-powered rifle??
Labels:
guns
Sunday, April 15, 2007
Participate in International Pixel-Stained Technopeasant Day on April 23!
There's been various...um, discussions in various places about how writers should/should not promote their work, mostly centering around whether they should put their writing on the Web for free.
While this particular posting by current SFWA Vice President Howard V. Hendrix did not start the discussion, it's generated quite a bit of comment, particularly by SFWA presidential candidate John Scalzi.
Writer Jo Walton came up with a clever way to respond to this bruhaha: International Pixel-Stained Technopeasant Day on April 23.
Now, I'm not in SFWA; I haven't written or sold much fiction. I've made a fair amount of money over the years as a tech writer, and some as a free lancer. However, I believe the whole concept of "technopeasanthood" is, frankly, very old-fashioned. If you enjoy participating on the Web, sharing some of your fiction/non-fiction/art/music/photos/knitting designs/recipes - so what? Participating on the Web may help your career or it may hinder it, but it's hardly the business of a writer's organization to disparage this sales/publicity venue in the way Howard Hendrix did.
But this isn't merely a writer's issue - it's a an issue for anyone who sees the Web as something a little larger than a big bulletin board.
So I urge anyone to use the Web to help spread your own creativity on the Web on April 23.
There are also T-shirts available at:
http://www.cafepress.com/pixelstained
I plan to wear mine the Saturday of the Nebula awards on May 12 (though not to the banquet itself).
While this particular posting by current SFWA Vice President Howard V. Hendrix did not start the discussion, it's generated quite a bit of comment, particularly by SFWA presidential candidate John Scalzi.
Writer Jo Walton came up with a clever way to respond to this bruhaha: International Pixel-Stained Technopeasant Day on April 23.
Now, I'm not in SFWA; I haven't written or sold much fiction. I've made a fair amount of money over the years as a tech writer, and some as a free lancer. However, I believe the whole concept of "technopeasanthood" is, frankly, very old-fashioned. If you enjoy participating on the Web, sharing some of your fiction/non-fiction/art/music/photos/knitting designs/recipes - so what? Participating on the Web may help your career or it may hinder it, but it's hardly the business of a writer's organization to disparage this sales/publicity venue in the way Howard Hendrix did.
But this isn't merely a writer's issue - it's a an issue for anyone who sees the Web as something a little larger than a big bulletin board.
So I urge anyone to use the Web to help spread your own creativity on the Web on April 23.
There are also T-shirts available at:
http://www.cafepress.com/pixelstained
I plan to wear mine the Saturday of the Nebula awards on May 12 (though not to the banquet itself).
Labels:
sfwa,
technopeasant,
web
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
The Deck Is Done - 4/10/07
We had our deck built by Archadeck, locally represented by Hall Construction:
We'd talked to several different deck builders, but Archadeck gave us the best price for a composite deck, which is what we wanted.
So what's the long distance view from the side of the deck like?
This coal mine has been operational since last summer. The mine is already somewhat filled in. Apparently, some homes may wind up on top of the mine in the future. It's likely that coal was removed from this part of the neighborhood before the houses were built as well.
Luckily, this is the view from most of the deck:
It's so nice to have a back yard with only woods in view, you have no idea. Each of the first two houses we owned had other houses in back.
We'd talked to several different deck builders, but Archadeck gave us the best price for a composite deck, which is what we wanted.
So what's the long distance view from the side of the deck like?
This coal mine has been operational since last summer. The mine is already somewhat filled in. Apparently, some homes may wind up on top of the mine in the future. It's likely that coal was removed from this part of the neighborhood before the houses were built as well.
Luckily, this is the view from most of the deck:
It's so nice to have a back yard with only woods in view, you have no idea. Each of the first two houses we owned had other houses in back.
Labels:
deck
Monday, April 09, 2007
Daily Deck Blogging - 4/9/07
One of the two builders got sick today. so the deck wasn't quite finished today. However, it's very close!
So tomorrow, it should be finished for sure!
Of course, it's only supposed to reach 46 tomorrow, so it might not matter too much...
So tomorrow, it should be finished for sure!
Of course, it's only supposed to reach 46 tomorrow, so it might not matter too much...
Labels:
deck
Sunday, April 08, 2007
Daily Deck Blogging - 4/7/06
OK, so I'm a day late...
Anyway, the contractors came over for a little while on Saturday, trimmed the floor planks and started to put in the posts for the railings.
View from the deck:
View from the driveway:
It looks like they should be finished on Monday.
Yesterday, I had lunch with some local folks from TheOneRing.net. It's a board where everyone is pretty much required to use pseudonyms. It turned out that one of the folks at lunch was someone I knew slightly as she's a local tech writer. One of the other attendees was a former tech writer. Small world and all.
Anyway, the contractors came over for a little while on Saturday, trimmed the floor planks and started to put in the posts for the railings.
View from the deck:
View from the driveway:
It looks like they should be finished on Monday.
Yesterday, I had lunch with some local folks from TheOneRing.net. It's a board where everyone is pretty much required to use pseudonyms. It turned out that one of the folks at lunch was someone I knew slightly as she's a local tech writer. One of the other attendees was a former tech writer. Small world and all.
Labels:
deck
Friday, April 06, 2007
Daily Deck Blogging - 4/6/07
It was again very cold out for April - I think it didn't get any warmer than 35 (over 20 degrees colder than normal). It wasn't quite as windy today as it had been yesterday.
The builders made very good progress. The support beams and floor of the deck are done. I stepped out onto the deck for the first time this afternoon:
Yeah, I know, I didn't walk out that far. But, still, the railings should be up tomorrow!
Now that most of the deck is built, the storage area under the deck is going to be much taller than I'd realized. I'd always imagined the sub-deck area to be very cave-like, and it really isn't.
The builders made very good progress. The support beams and floor of the deck are done. I stepped out onto the deck for the first time this afternoon:
Yeah, I know, I didn't walk out that far. But, still, the railings should be up tomorrow!
Now that most of the deck is built, the storage area under the deck is going to be much taller than I'd realized. I'd always imagined the sub-deck area to be very cave-like, and it really isn't.
Labels:
deck
Thursday, April 05, 2007
Daily Deck Blogging - 4/5/07
It was windy and 25 degrees colder than normal today. It reached a high of 31 (and, remember, it's April). The contractors came and worked most of the day. We've been encouraging them to use the garage as much as possible.
But it's starting to look more like a deck now because some of the floor is now in. Here's the view from the sliders:
And here's the view from the back yard:
But it's starting to look more like a deck now because some of the floor is now in. Here's the view from the sliders:
And here's the view from the back yard:
Labels:
deck
Wednesday, April 04, 2007
Daily Deck Blogging - 4/4/07
The builders arrived early this morning and worked until about 4. Unlike yesterday, when it was sunny and warm, the temperature dropped from 57 this morning to about 40 and very windy this afternoon. They made pretty good progress - it's looking more like a deck now.
View from the sliders:
View from the driveway:
And the supporting posts don't go in until tomorrow. They spent some of the afternoon digging the postholes. Before they can pour concrete, a local inspector has to come out and make sure the post holes are prepared correctly and the frame has been attached to the house properly.
View from the sliders:
View from the driveway:
And the supporting posts don't go in until tomorrow. They spent some of the afternoon digging the postholes. Before they can pour concrete, a local inspector has to come out and make sure the post holes are prepared correctly and the frame has been attached to the house properly.
Labels:
deck
Tuesday, April 03, 2007
Daily Deck Blogging - 4/3/07
The contractor started on the deck today! We didn't expect they'd start this soon (we thought it might be another 10 days), but I was glad to see them. They expect to be done next Monday (it takes about five working days to build a standard deck).
Deck deconstructed (or pre-constructed), beginning of day one:
View of the deck-in-progress from the sliding glass doors, end of day one:
View from the driveway, end of day one:
OK, it doesn't look like that much happened the first day. Putting in the piece under the door that will help attach the deck to the house takes a while. They also cut a fair amount of wood during the day for later in the week. I expected the posts would be installed first, but they said the post installation is a day two job.
Deck deconstructed (or pre-constructed), beginning of day one:
View of the deck-in-progress from the sliding glass doors, end of day one:
View from the driveway, end of day one:
OK, it doesn't look like that much happened the first day. Putting in the piece under the door that will help attach the deck to the house takes a while. They also cut a fair amount of wood during the day for later in the week. I expected the posts would be installed first, but they said the post installation is a day two job.
Labels:
deck
Monday, April 02, 2007
Monday Garden Blogging - 4/2/07
We had a few days of good weather over the last week, followed by some rain.
The crocuses and dafodils in front haven't grown quite as well as I would have hoped. The front gets constant sun, but as it's beside the road, the ground also get more salt from the road and likely visits by dogs.
We're due to have another day of warm, sunny weather, and then it will get cold and, probably, snowy. We'll see if any of the flowers survive until after Easter... *sigh*
The crocuses and dafodils in front haven't grown quite as well as I would have hoped. The front gets constant sun, but as it's beside the road, the ground also get more salt from the road and likely visits by dogs.
We're due to have another day of warm, sunny weather, and then it will get cold and, probably, snowy. We'll see if any of the flowers survive until after Easter... *sigh*
Labels:
Monday Garden Blogging
Thursday, March 29, 2007
2007 Hugo Nominations
Best Novel
Eifelheim by Michael F. Flynn (Tor)
His Majecty's Dragon/Temeraire by Naomi Novik (Del Rey)
Glasshouse by Charles Stross (Ace)
Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge (Tor)
Blindsight by Peter Watts (Tor)
Best Novella
"The Walls of the Universe" by Paul Melko (Asimov's, April/May 2006)
"A Billion Eves" by Robert Reed (Asimov's, October/November 2006)
"Inclination" by William Shunn (Asimov's April/May 2006)
"Lord Weary's Empire" by Michael Swanwick (Asimov's December 2006)
"Julian" by Robert Charles Wilson (PS Publishing)
Best Novelette
"Yellow Card Man" by Paolo Bacigalupi (Asimov's December 2006)
"Dawn, and Sunset, and the Colours of the Earth" by Michael F. Flynn (Asimov's December 2006)
"The Djinn's Wife" by Ian McDonald (Asimov's July 2006)
"All the Things You Are" by Mike Resnick (Jim Baen's Universe October 2006)
"Pol Pot's Beautiful Daughter" by Geoff Ryman (F&SF October/November 2006)
Best Short Story
"How to Talk to Girls at Parties" by Neil Gaiman (Fragile Things)
"Kin" by Bruce McAllister (Asimov's February 2006)
"Impossible Dreams" by Timothy Pratt (Asimov's July 2006)
"Eight Episodes" by Robert Reed (Asimov's June 2006)
"The House Beyond Your Sky" by Benjamin Rosenbaum (Strange Horizons September 2006)
Best Related Book
About Writing: Seven Essays, Four Letters, and Five Interviews by Samuel R. Delany (Wesleyan University Press)
Heinlein's Children: The Juveniles by Joseph T. Major (Advent)
James Tiptree, Jr.: The Double Life of Alice B. Sheldon edited by Julie Phillips (St. Martin's Press)
Cover Story: The Art of John Picacio by John Picacio (MonkeyBrain Books )
Worldcon Guest of Honor Speeches by Mike Resnick and Joe Siclari (ISFiC Press)
Best Dramatic Presentation
Children of Men (Universal Pictures)
Pan's Labyrinth (Picturehouse)
The Prestige (Warner Brothers/Touchstone Pictures)
A Scanner Darkly (Warner Independent Pictures)
V for Vendetta (Warner Brothers)
Note: Due to a file corruption during electronic tabulation of the nominees, Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest appeared on the initial Hugo ballot. A subsequent audit revealed that this was an error; Pirates was removed and Pan's Labyrinth was added to the final Hugo ballot.
Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form
Battlestar Galactica, "Downloaded"
Doctor Who, "Army of Ghosts" and "Doomsday"
Doctor Who, "Girl in the Fireplace"
Doctor Who, "School Reunion"
Stargate SG-1, "200"
Best Professional Editor, Long Form
Lou Anders
James Patrick Baen
Ginjer Buchanan
David G. Hartwell
Patrick Nielsen Hayden
Best Professional Editor, Short Form
Gardner Dozois
David G. Hartwell
Stanley Schmidt
Gordon Van Gelder
Sheila Williams
Best Professional Artist
Bob Eggleton
Donato Giancola
Stephan Martiniere
John Jude Palencar
John Picacio
Best Semiprozine
Ansible, edited by Dave Langford
Interzone, edited by Andy Cox
Lady Churchill's Rosebud Wristlet, edited by Gavin J. Grant
Locus, edited by Charles N. Brown, Kirsten Gong-Wong, & Liza Groen Trombi
The New York Review of Science Fiction, edited by Kathryn Cramer, David Hartwell & Kevin J. Maroney
Best Fanzine
Banana Wings ed. by Claire Brialey & Mark Plummer
Challenger edited by Guy Lillian, III
The Drink Tank edited by Christopher J. Garcia
Plokta edited by Alison Scott, Steve Davies & Mike Scott
Science Fiction Five-yearly edited by Lee Hoffman, Geri Sullivan & Randy Byers
Best Fan Writer
Chris Garcia
John Hertz
Dave Langford
John Scalzi
Steven H Silver
Best Fan Artist
Brad W. Foster
Teddy Harvia
Sue Mason
Steve Stiles
Frank Wu
John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer
Sponsored by Dell Magazines
Scott Lynch
Sarah Monette
Naomi Novik
Brandon Sanderson
Lawrence M. Schoen
Labels:
Hugos
Monday, March 26, 2007
Monday Garden Blogging - 3/26/07
Over time, I've seen Friday cat blogging, kid blogging, et.c. But there doesn't seem Monday Garden Blogging. For employed people, it's a way to show off what you did over the weekend. For those of us unemployed (or underemployed or retired), it's just a day to go out and take some pictures. If you plan put up periodic photos showing how your garden grows, drop me a line and I'll add you to a list of garden bloggers.
As a baseline for my gardening photos, here's the front of my house
on 2/3/2007:
And here it is today, 3/26/07:
As you can tell from the photo, spring is finally hitting Western Pennsylvania. Things we planted last year are starting to grow, and I planted a few new items:
The plant at the bottom is heather. I think it's particularly pretty. I was going to plant it up by the little patio in the front, but the Lowe's garden center clerk warned me that heather attracts bees, so you don't want to sit beside it.
The red flower at the top is another perennial, the fire star dianthus.
I planted a few "ready to go" annuals this morning. I think the larger flowers are begonias (they were simply labeled "annuals" at the store) and the smaller ones are definitely pansies.
Finally, here's the spot will the deck will go in a few weeks:
As a baseline for my gardening photos, here's the front of my house
on 2/3/2007:
And here it is today, 3/26/07:
As you can tell from the photo, spring is finally hitting Western Pennsylvania. Things we planted last year are starting to grow, and I planted a few new items:
The plant at the bottom is heather. I think it's particularly pretty. I was going to plant it up by the little patio in the front, but the Lowe's garden center clerk warned me that heather attracts bees, so you don't want to sit beside it.
The red flower at the top is another perennial, the fire star dianthus.
I planted a few "ready to go" annuals this morning. I think the larger flowers are begonias (they were simply labeled "annuals" at the store) and the smaller ones are definitely pansies.
Finally, here's the spot will the deck will go in a few weeks:
Labels:
Monday Garden Blogging
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Bocktown Beer: At Long Last, a Non-smoking Bar!!
When we moved out to the metro West area last summer, one small plus was being close to another Rotelli Pizza (in the Target Plaza at the Pointe, North Fayette), as we were big fans.
Not big enough, apparently, as Rotelli closed almost as soon as we finished unpacking.
Sometime late last year, a new restaurant took over the space, called Bocktown Beer. "Oh great, another smoky bar," we assumed, so we never stopped in.
About a month ago, I did stop in, and quickly regretted not stopping in before.
Bocktown Beer has a huge bottled beer selection (around 400(!) types of beer), very good food, and, most important is non-smoking!.
Don't get me wrong. I have always liked Fat Heads and Sharp Edge and Pipers. I like a place with a varied beer selection and good food. But I can't love a bar that allows smoking as being around smoking gives me migraines. A non-smoking area in a bar is still usually too smoky to be really pleasant (though both Sharp Edge's have relatively smoke-free restaurant areas). I'd like to be able to sit at a bar and have a beer and maybe some pretzels without having to run out for fresh air after a half hour. When I travel to Massachusetts or California, I spend more time in bars there because they're non-smoking (and doing good business, frankly).
While the menu at Bocktown isn't huge, they do fine bar food and sandwiches. There are new specials everyday. And the French fries alone are worth the trip. They do beer tastings every Wednesday
evening, and I think there's live music once or twice a week.
I have three minor complaints about Bocktown:
Those minor complaints aside, we're now pretty regular customers. So if you're looking for a non-smoking bar with a great beer selection and good food, Bocktown Beer is for you.
Not big enough, apparently, as Rotelli closed almost as soon as we finished unpacking.
Sometime late last year, a new restaurant took over the space, called Bocktown Beer. "Oh great, another smoky bar," we assumed, so we never stopped in.
About a month ago, I did stop in, and quickly regretted not stopping in before.
Bocktown Beer has a huge bottled beer selection (around 400(!) types of beer), very good food, and, most important is non-smoking!.
Don't get me wrong. I have always liked Fat Heads and Sharp Edge and Pipers. I like a place with a varied beer selection and good food. But I can't love a bar that allows smoking as being around smoking gives me migraines. A non-smoking area in a bar is still usually too smoky to be really pleasant (though both Sharp Edge's have relatively smoke-free restaurant areas). I'd like to be able to sit at a bar and have a beer and maybe some pretzels without having to run out for fresh air after a half hour. When I travel to Massachusetts or California, I spend more time in bars there because they're non-smoking (and doing good business, frankly).
While the menu at Bocktown isn't huge, they do fine bar food and sandwiches. There are new specials everyday. And the French fries alone are worth the trip. They do beer tastings every Wednesday
evening, and I think there's live music once or twice a week.
I have three minor complaints about Bocktown:
- the bottled beer can be a little expensive. I guess I've
been spoiled by The Beer Store over in Moon, where
the cost of bottled beer for take-out isn't too bad at all.
On the other hand, the bar under The Beer Store is so
smoky I've never even had a drink in there. - if only it could be a little larger. There's an empty
storefront beside Bocktown, and I wish they'd lease it now! - I know guys frequent the bar more than women, but there are
TV channels other than ESPN...
Those minor complaints aside, we're now pretty regular customers. So if you're looking for a non-smoking bar with a great beer selection and good food, Bocktown Beer is for you.
Labels:
beer,
metrowest,
restaurant
Sunday, March 11, 2007
Stunning Performances by the Pittsburgh Symphony and Violinist Julia Fischer
Jim and I try to go to the Pittsburgh Symphony once or twice a year. We bought tickets to four concerts this season and have really lucked out with our selections.
Last night, we heard the sublime violinist Julia Fischer perform the Beethoven Violin Concerto.
We're frankly not up on the current crop of classical performers. We had no idea who Julia Fischer was. We know now. To say she and the symphony were superb last night do neither of them justice.
The Beethoven Violin Concerto is the sort of classical piece we've all heard snippets of. It is a fairly long and challenging piece, for the orchestra as well as the violinist. They were all beyond wonderful last night.
I know that the Brahms piece in the second part of the concert was recorded; I wonder if the violin concerto was because I'd run out and buy that without hesitation once it is released.
Last night, we heard the sublime violinist Julia Fischer perform the Beethoven Violin Concerto.
We're frankly not up on the current crop of classical performers. We had no idea who Julia Fischer was. We know now. To say she and the symphony were superb last night do neither of them justice.
The Beethoven Violin Concerto is the sort of classical piece we've all heard snippets of. It is a fairly long and challenging piece, for the orchestra as well as the violinist. They were all beyond wonderful last night.
I know that the Brahms piece in the second part of the concert was recorded; I wonder if the violin concerto was because I'd run out and buy that without hesitation once it is released.
Labels:
classical music,
pittsburgh
Sunday, March 04, 2007
Ann Coulter: Why Does the National Media Pay Attention to Trolls?
From Wikipedia (as of 3/4/07)
In 1996, in the early days of the popularization of the Internet, I attended a journalism conference in Pittsburgh. At the time, I said I thought the lack of editorial control on the Internet was a strength and not a weakness. Let the people do their own content creation and their own filtering.
However, the irrationality of some areas of the Web have been embraced by mass media. If anything, some people now considered part of mass media are nothing more than trolls.
In particular, Ann Coulter.
This woman has had nothing useful or rational to add to public discourse. Yet, she is considered a media celebrity, and when she says something, people pay attention.
Why?
The only way to raise the level of public discourse is to ignore the people who only want to shout inanities. If we want a rational, reasoned discourse on the issues, we should ignore the Ann Coulters, the Bill O'Reillys, the Al Sharptons, the Kenneth Engs of the world, and only pay attention to people who can back up their opinions with facts.
Trolls are people who should be ignored in the public discourse. They should not be leading the public discourse. They only want to stir up controversy, not enlighten issues in any way.
As we've said on the Internet for many years: Do not feed the energy beasts. These people are nothing, nothing but energy beasts. Ignore them.
In Internet terminology, a troll is a person who enters an established community such as an online discussion forum and intentionally tries to cause disruption, often in the form of posting messages that are inflammatory, insulting, incorrect, inaccurate, absurd, or off-topic, with the intent of provoking a reaction from others.
In 1996, in the early days of the popularization of the Internet, I attended a journalism conference in Pittsburgh. At the time, I said I thought the lack of editorial control on the Internet was a strength and not a weakness. Let the people do their own content creation and their own filtering.
However, the irrationality of some areas of the Web have been embraced by mass media. If anything, some people now considered part of mass media are nothing more than trolls.
In particular, Ann Coulter.
This woman has had nothing useful or rational to add to public discourse. Yet, she is considered a media celebrity, and when she says something, people pay attention.
Why?
The only way to raise the level of public discourse is to ignore the people who only want to shout inanities. If we want a rational, reasoned discourse on the issues, we should ignore the Ann Coulters, the Bill O'Reillys, the Al Sharptons, the Kenneth Engs of the world, and only pay attention to people who can back up their opinions with facts.
Trolls are people who should be ignored in the public discourse. They should not be leading the public discourse. They only want to stir up controversy, not enlighten issues in any way.
As we've said on the Internet for many years: Do not feed the energy beasts. These people are nothing, nothing but energy beasts. Ignore them.
Labels:
mass media,
trolls
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Oscars 2007: Predictions & Commentary
While there were a few good movies in 2006, the overall quality of theatrical movies continues to sink. I've been finding television (with things like Rome and Battlestar Galactica) to be much more interesting and challenging than movies.
For the first time in many years, I've only seen two of the nominees for Best Picture: Little Miss Sunshine and The Queen. I liked both of these movies very much, but The Queen is way too subtle and quiet to win a Best Picture award and Little Miss Sunshine is a comedy, which means it has almost no chance to take Best Picture. I don't like graphic violence so I haven't seen Babel or The Departed. I'm usually not overly fond of war movies, so I haven't seen Letters from Iwo Jima. I regret not having seen Dreamgirls or Venus. The movie that impressed me the most last year, Children of Men only got some technical nominations.
I will note what I haven't seen and will go ahead with my predictions anyway. For the last few years, I've been hedging my bets with a "will win" (WW) and "should win" (SW) before each predicted winner.
A really uninspiring year. Of the five, I liked The Queen the best, but it's way too quiet and subtle for
a Best Picture win. Little Miss Sunshine was probably the quirkiest and most original in the bunch, so
that's the movie I'll support.
Scorsese is so owed... I'd rather see Stephen Frears win this year because The Departed doesn't sound
like Scorsese's best work and The Queen is a quiet little masterpiece. Still, I'm a realist, and I can't
complain too much if Scorsese wins.
I have always had a soft spot for Peter O'Toole, another person who is so owed. But I would certainly have no objection is Forest Whitaker wins, who probably gave the strongest performance of the year. Still...O'Toole's of an age
where he may have given one of his last performances.
There usually aren't too many locks, but this is certainly one of them. Helen Mirren has had such a brilliant
year. She is completely magnificent in The Queen. Judi Dench appears to give a great performance in
Notes on a Scandal, but the movie just seems oh so stupid - I hate it when the trailer gives away
every twist of the movie. Meryl Streep was terrific in The Devil Wears Prada, too.
This isn't quite the lock it appeared to be a few weeks ago. I think Abigail Breslin could win. But the other
newcomer, Jennifer Hudson, is more likely.
This is another category that might not be quite the lock it once appeared to be. Alan Arkin has had a great career, and, like Peter O'Toole, never won an Oscar. Eddie Murphy is a wildly erratic actor, who keeps keeps making brain-dead movies for the money. It's of course a wonderful thing that Eddie apparently has given a fine performance in Dreamgirls. But, for the Oscar voters to be voting at the same time that they're seeing constant ads for Norbit, one of the most awful movies I've ever seen ads for...gaak. So I hope Murphy might have gotten enough backlash for the award to go to Arkin.
While a bit too violent for my taste, Pan's Labyrinth was an incredible visual feast of a movie, with great performances
all the way around (especially from the young Ivana Baquero as Ofelia). There might be a chance that The Lives of Others could sneak in, but I doubt it.
I don't have really strong feelings about any of these movies. I've only seen Happy Feet, and while it
was a charming little movie, it didn't quite work for me. Cars looks silly, but it keeps winning awards, so it will
probably take the award.
Children of Men was the best movie of last year. Clive Owen deserved an Oscar nomination. I'd like to see
it win this Oscar, but I have the bad feeling that Borat (which was simultaneously clever and stupid) will win.
This may be the trickiest category of them all. While last year was a rather weak year for movies, the scripts for Sunshine, Queen and Pan were all quite good, and I've heard interesting things about Iwo Jima.
So while I think Sunshine was a little more original (and gleefully subversive), the script for The Queen was
an amazingly restrained exercise in showing and not telling.
I haven't even heard any of these songs, except for, maybe, Love You I Do. So I'll select that one.
So what will Al Gore do with his minute on international television?
I also have no idea about this one.
It's rather appalling that Pan's Labyrinth is not in this category. The effects in Pirates, like the rest of
that movie - are a bit of a joke. Superman Returns is probably a less objectionable choice.
People are still talking about some of the amazing shots in Children of Men. Pan's Labyrinth probably had
a little more "stylish" photography, but it just wasn't quite as interesting as the photography in Children of Men.
I'm sorry to see that The Illusionist, which I felt had a better look than The Prestige wasn't up
for Best Art Direction. However, this award should go to Pan's Labyrinth.
No Time for Nuts is the only one of these I've seen, and it's quite clever.
Dreamgirls did the best job at showing the fashions of the time.
Apocalypto's make-up is so good that it's painful to watch and convinced me not to see the movie.
Sound Engineer Kevin O'Connell is the Susan Lucci of the Oscars. He has now been nominated for the Best Sound Mixing Oscar an incredible 19 times over the last 23 years. He was part of the Sound Mixing team for Apocalypto, and I think his team may walk away with one this year.
War movies or big action/adventure movies tend to take the sound awards. I expect one of Clint Eastwood's two war
movies to win this one.
People consistently praised the editing and direction of United 93, which was probably one of the most claustrophobic
movies of last year. Since Greenglass is unlikely to win Best Director, perhaps the movie will take Film Editing. Still,
I think I'd rather see Children of Men win.
For the first time in many years, I've only seen two of the nominees for Best Picture: Little Miss Sunshine and The Queen. I liked both of these movies very much, but The Queen is way too subtle and quiet to win a Best Picture award and Little Miss Sunshine is a comedy, which means it has almost no chance to take Best Picture. I don't like graphic violence so I haven't seen Babel or The Departed. I'm usually not overly fond of war movies, so I haven't seen Letters from Iwo Jima. I regret not having seen Dreamgirls or Venus. The movie that impressed me the most last year, Children of Men only got some technical nominations.
I will note what I haven't seen and will go ahead with my predictions anyway. For the last few years, I've been hedging my bets with a "will win" (WW) and "should win" (SW) before each predicted winner.
Best Picture
- Babel
- The Departed
- (WW) Letters From Iwo Jima
- (SW) Little Miss Sunshine
- The Queen
A really uninspiring year. Of the five, I liked The Queen the best, but it's way too quiet and subtle for
a Best Picture win. Little Miss Sunshine was probably the quirkiest and most original in the bunch, so
that's the movie I'll support.
Best Director
- Clint Eastwood, Letters From Iwo Jima
- Stephen Frears, The Queen
- Paul Greengrass, United 93
- Alejandro Gonzales Inarritu, Babel
- (SW, WW) Martin Scorsese, The Departed
Scorsese is so owed... I'd rather see Stephen Frears win this year because The Departed doesn't sound
like Scorsese's best work and The Queen is a quiet little masterpiece. Still, I'm a realist, and I can't
complain too much if Scorsese wins.
Best Actor
- Leonardo DiCaprio, Blood Diamond
- Ryan Gosling, Half Nelson
- (SW) Peter O'Toole, Venus
- Will Smith, The Pursuit of Happyness
- (WW) Forest Whitaker, The Last King of Scotland
I have always had a soft spot for Peter O'Toole, another person who is so owed. But I would certainly have no objection is Forest Whitaker wins, who probably gave the strongest performance of the year. Still...O'Toole's of an age
where he may have given one of his last performances.
Best Actress
- Penelope Cruz, Volver
- Judi Dench, Notes on a Scandal
- (SW, WW) Helen Mirren, The Queen
- Meryl Streep, The Devil Wears Prada
- Kate Winslet, Little Children
There usually aren't too many locks, but this is certainly one of them. Helen Mirren has had such a brilliant
year. She is completely magnificent in The Queen. Judi Dench appears to give a great performance in
Notes on a Scandal, but the movie just seems oh so stupid - I hate it when the trailer gives away
every twist of the movie. Meryl Streep was terrific in The Devil Wears Prada, too.
Best Supporting Actress
- Adriana Barraza, Babel
- Cate Blanchett, Notes on a Scandal
- Abigail Breslin, Little Miss Sunshine
- (SW, WW) Jennifer Hudson, Dreamgirls
- Rinko Kikuchi, Babel
This isn't quite the lock it appeared to be a few weeks ago. I think Abigail Breslin could win. But the other
newcomer, Jennifer Hudson, is more likely.
Best Supporting Actor
- (SW) Alan Arkin, Little Miss Sunshine
- Jackie Earle Haley, Little Children
- (WW) Eddie Murphy, Dreamgirls
- Mark Wahlberg, The Departed
This is another category that might not be quite the lock it once appeared to be. Alan Arkin has had a great career, and, like Peter O'Toole, never won an Oscar. Eddie Murphy is a wildly erratic actor, who keeps keeps making brain-dead movies for the money. It's of course a wonderful thing that Eddie apparently has given a fine performance in Dreamgirls. But, for the Oscar voters to be voting at the same time that they're seeing constant ads for Norbit, one of the most awful movies I've ever seen ads for...gaak. So I hope Murphy might have gotten enough backlash for the award to go to Arkin.
Best Foreign Language Film
- Efter Brylluppet (aka After the Wedding), Denmark
- Indigenes (aka Days of Glory), Algeria
- (SW, WW) El Laberinto del Fauno (aka Pan's Labyrinth), Mexico
- Das Leben der Anderen (aka The Lives of Others), Germany
- Water, Canada
While a bit too violent for my taste, Pan's Labyrinth was an incredible visual feast of a movie, with great performances
all the way around (especially from the young Ivana Baquero as Ofelia). There might be a chance that The Lives of Others could sneak in, but I doubt it.
Best Animated Feature Film
- (SW, WW) Cars
- Happy Feet
- Monster House
I don't have really strong feelings about any of these movies. I've only seen Happy Feet, and while it
was a charming little movie, it didn't quite work for me. Cars looks silly, but it keeps winning awards, so it will
probably take the award.
Best Adapted Screenplay
- (WW) Borat
- (SW) Children of Men
- The Departed
- Little Children
- Notes on a Scandal
Children of Men was the best movie of last year. Clive Owen deserved an Oscar nomination. I'd like to see
it win this Oscar, but I have the bad feeling that Borat (which was simultaneously clever and stupid) will win.
Best Original Screenplay
- Babel
- Letters From Iwo Jima
- (WW) Little Miss Sunshine
- (SW) The Queen
- Pan's Labyrinth
This may be the trickiest category of them all. While last year was a rather weak year for movies, the scripts for Sunshine, Queen and Pan were all quite good, and I've heard interesting things about Iwo Jima.
So while I think Sunshine was a little more original (and gleefully subversive), the script for The Queen was
an amazingly restrained exercise in showing and not telling.
Best Music (Score)
- Babel
- The Good German
- Notes on a Scandal
- (SW, WW) Pan's Labyrinth
- The Queen
Best Music (Song)
- "I Need to Wake Up" - An Inconvenient Truth (performed by Melissa Etheridge)
- "Listen" - Dreamgirls (performed by Beyonce Knowles)
- (SW, WW) "Love You I Do" - Dreamgirls (performed by Jennifer Hudson)
- "Our Town" - Cars (performed by James Taylor)
- "Patience" - Dreamgirls (performed by Eddie Murphy, Keith Robinson, Anika Noni Rose)
I haven't even heard any of these songs, except for, maybe, Love You I Do. So I'll select that one.
Best Documentary Feature
- Deliver Us From Evil
- (SW, WW) An Inconvenient Truth
- Iraq In Fragments
- Jesus Camp
- My Country, My Country
So what will Al Gore do with his minute on international television?
Best Documentary Short Subject
- The Blood of Yingzhou District
- (SW, WW) Recycled Life
- Rehearsing A Dream
- Two Hands
I also have no idea about this one.
Best Visual Effects
- Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
- Poseidon
- (SW, WW) Superman Returns
It's rather appalling that Pan's Labyrinth is not in this category. The effects in Pirates, like the rest of
that movie - are a bit of a joke. Superman Returns is probably a less objectionable choice.
Best Cinematography
- The Black Dahlia
- (SW, WW) Children of Men
- The Illusionist
- Pan's Labyrinth
- The Prestige
People are still talking about some of the amazing shots in Children of Men. Pan's Labyrinth probably had
a little more "stylish" photography, but it just wasn't quite as interesting as the photography in Children of Men.
Best Art Direction
- Dreamgirls
- The Good Shepherd
- (SW, WW) Pan's Labyrinth
- Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
- The Prestige
I'm sorry to see that The Illusionist, which I felt had a better look than The Prestige wasn't up
for Best Art Direction. However, this award should go to Pan's Labyrinth.
Best Animated Short Film
- The Danish Poet
- Lifted
- The Little Matchgirl
- Maestro
- (SW, WW) No Time for Nuts
No Time for Nuts is the only one of these I've seen, and it's quite clever.
Best Short Film
- Binta and the Great Idea
- Eramos Pocos (One Too Many)
- Helmer & Son
- The Saviour
- (SW, WW)West Bank Story
Best Costume Design
- Curse of the Golden Flower
- The Devil Wears Prada
- (SW, WW) Dreamgirls
- Marie Antoinette
- The Queen
Dreamgirls did the best job at showing the fashions of the time.
Best Make-up
- (SW, WW) Apocalypto
- Click
- Pan's Labyrinth
Apocalypto's make-up is so good that it's painful to watch and convinced me not to see the movie.
Best Sound Mixing
- (SW, WW) Apocalypto
- Blood Diamond
- Dreamgirls
- Flags of our Fathers
- Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
Sound Engineer Kevin O'Connell is the Susan Lucci of the Oscars. He has now been nominated for the Best Sound Mixing Oscar an incredible 19 times over the last 23 years. He was part of the Sound Mixing team for Apocalypto, and I think his team may walk away with one this year.
Sound Editing
- Apocalypto
- Blood Diamond
- (SW, WW) Letters From Iwo Jima
- Flags of our Fathers
- Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
War movies or big action/adventure movies tend to take the sound awards. I expect one of Clint Eastwood's two war
movies to win this one.
Best Film Editing
- Babel
- Blood Diamond
- (SW) Children of Men
- The Departed
- (WW) United 93
People consistently praised the editing and direction of United 93, which was probably one of the most claustrophobic
movies of last year. Since Greenglass is unlikely to win Best Director, perhaps the movie will take Film Editing. Still,
I think I'd rather see Children of Men win.
Saturday, January 13, 2007
SouthSideWorks Theater Has Sunk...
To go to SouthSideWorks Theater, you have to pay for parking and pay a little extra for movies. For the first year or two they were open, SouthSideWorks had an advantage - no pre-movie commercials. So it was worth it.
Unfortunately, this is no longer true.
SouthSideWorks now subjects its customers to an excrutiating pre-show barrage of noise called something like Preflix. Preflix advertises Pepsi at you, plays very loud noise and is an awful excuse for pre-show entertainment.
In fairness, SouthSideWorks isn't showing genuine commercials. Once this Preflix thing is over, they go straight to trailers. But, sorry, Preflix is even worse than standard commercials because it's too loud and hideous.
We went to SouthSideWorks to see Children of Men - a brilliant movie that I highly recommend. But I can't recommend SouthSideWorks anymore. I guess we've made our last trip there.
Unfortunately, this is no longer true.
SouthSideWorks now subjects its customers to an excrutiating pre-show barrage of noise called something like Preflix. Preflix advertises Pepsi at you, plays very loud noise and is an awful excuse for pre-show entertainment.
In fairness, SouthSideWorks isn't showing genuine commercials. Once this Preflix thing is over, they go straight to trailers. But, sorry, Preflix is even worse than standard commercials because it's too loud and hideous.
We went to SouthSideWorks to see Children of Men - a brilliant movie that I highly recommend. But I can't recommend SouthSideWorks anymore. I guess we've made our last trip there.
Sunday, December 24, 2006
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)